BASIC thinking InternationalBASIC thinking International
Font ResizerAa
  • Recommends
  • Startup
  • Smart Things
  • Science
  • Tech
  • Travel
  • Automotive
Search
  • Pages
    • Home
    • Blog Index
    • Contact Us
    • Search Page
    • 404 Page
  • Categories
    • Science
    • Smart Things
    • Startup
    • Tech
    • Automotive
    • Recommends
    • Travel
  • Personalized
    • My Saves
    • My Feed
    • My Interests
    • History
Follow US
erde-foto-unsplash-com-nasa
Technology

Verdict: Users have no right to pixelation on Google Earth

Christian Erxleben
Last updated: June 25, 2020 11:29 am
Christian Erxleben
Share
Unsplash.com / NASA
SHARE

Google Earth is a wonderful tool to discover the world. Thereby we make partly curious discoveries. Now a homeowner wanted the service to pixelate his property. The district court of Itzehoe made its decision – and did not grant the complaint.

Contents
When two fundamental rights clashThere is no fundamental right to pixelation on Google Earth

We all have a right to protect our privacy. This applies even to public figures – like the german Chancellor Angela Merkel.

That’s why no one is allowed to take photographs with a telephoto lens in the garden or living room of private individuals and make the pictures publicly or privately accessible. All this is enshrined in the second article of the German Constitution in the general right of personality.

When two fundamental rights clash

However, it is often the case that in the event of a dispute, two different legal regulations come into conflict. On the one hand, there is the right of personality, for example, and on the other hand the right to freedom of information from the fifth article of the Basic Law.

For the judging judges the question then arises: Which right is more worthy of protection? Which right is more valuable in an individual case? This was exactly the problem facing the Itzehoe Regional Court (LG).

Specifically, a homeowner had sued Google for pixelating his house. The judges did not comply with this request in their ruling.

There is no fundamental right to pixelation on Google Earth

In their statement of reasons, they argue that neither persons nor other details from the private life of the applicant and his family can be seen on the relevant photograph.

In addition, the marker lands between four plots of land when the address is entered in Google Maps. A detailed allocation or even spying out is therefore not possible.

According to the judges, the pixelation desired by the house owner also leads to Google Earth being “rendered unusable”. The public interest in obtaining information should be taken into account in this case.

Although the judgement is not yet final, it seems clear: There is no fundamental right to pixelation. If personal details can be seen on the corresponding recording on Google Earth, however, the situation is probably different.

TAGGED:Google
Share This Article
Facebook Copy Link Print
ByChristian Erxleben
Follow:
Christian Erxleben is a journalist from Nuremberg, Germany. He is also the editor in chief of the famous German online magazine BASIC thinking. His interests include social media, marketing and tech. Follow him on Twitter.

You Might Also Like

google
Business

Layoffs, poor leadership and fear: Google employee spills the beans

3 Min Read
Technology

Every 8 seconds: Dangerous Android apps

5 Min Read
Telegram. Smartphone in the pocket of blue jeans on the Telegram smartphone screen on a blue, yellow, black background. Country in the smartphone Ukraine. July 2020. Kiev, Ukraine.
Social MediaTechnology

Telegram: New SMS function is an absolute privacy nightmare

4 Min Read
Stress engineer or architect with laptop and tablet holding hands at his head. He is having problems in work. Engineering concept.
BusinessTechnology

Physical work: AI should keep people working longer

4 Min Read
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?